Jindal: No tax hike
By
Greg
Hilburn
Louisiana
Gannett News 12-26-2007
Gov.-elect
Bobby Jindal says he would not support a tax increase under any
circumstances. "Our
budget has grown from $16 billion to $30 billion in six years," Jindal
said. "Our challenge now is to make sure we use those dollars
wisely." Jindal
said the state has plenty of income to meet its needs. "That
doesn't mean there won't have to be tough
budgeting decisions made," he said. "We have to set priorities and
stick to them." Jindal,
who will be inaugurated Jan. 14, sat down last week for an interview
with
Louisiana Gannett News at his transition headquarters on the LSU campus
to
discuss issues affecting the state.
Question:
Louisiana is expected to have more than a $2 billion budget surplus
during your
first year as governor. How do you plan to spend or save that money?
Answer:
Obviously, it's a good thing that revenues are so strong. I
believe it's responsible to use the surplus for one-time needs. It
wouldn't be
responsible to put that money in recurring programs to grow the size of
government. Revenue
forecasts are already projecting declines (in 2009 and 2010). We can't
use this
money to grow everyday expenses. The
surplus should be spent on infrastructure like roads and to pay down
our debt.
There are huge deferred maintenance needs on our university campuses
that would
benefit from one-time spending from the surplus. Reducing our debt now
would
save billions of dollars in interest down the road.
Q:
Gov. Kathleen Blanco approached economic development on a personal
level,
making recruiting calls and trips directly to companies. How do you see
your
role in economic development?
A:
I'm certainly going to be aggressive and willing to travel both in and
out of
state to recruit businesses. But
it's just as important to improve the conditions for businesses in our
state to
grow. We'll improve that business environment by eliminating business
taxes on
debt and equipment and by investing in infrastructure like roads and
ports. One
of the most important things we can do to attract and grow business is
provide
a trained work force by investing in the community college and
technical
college systems. But
the No. 1 thing we can do to attract business is improve our ethics
laws, which
is what the first special session of the Legislature will be dedicated
to doing
(in February). Too
often we want to throw a lot of money at one company, and we'll
certainly offer
incentive packages. But it's more important to improve the overall
business
climate.
Q:
Your first called special session of the Legislature will be on ethics.
Why is
that important?
A:
We need stronger laws and stronger enforcement. We
need to start by enforcing the laws we've got, but we haven't given the
Ethics
Commission the tools it needs to enforce them. That's going to take
more
funding and resources. Our
image has been damaged by our ethics reputation, which not only costs
us
investment by companies that would consider expanding here, but also
the trust
of our own citizens. We've
gotten an F grade in disclosure (of public officials and lobbyists) and
we're
ranked among the worst in integrity surveys. Disclosure
is going to be so important because we need transparency from our
public
officials. Let us see the conflicts of interest so there's nowhere for
them to
hide. I
don't think legislators should be able to do business with the state.
They
shouldn't be first in line for state contracts. That sends the wrong
message to
the rest of our citizens and to the country. We
need to close the loopholes that allow legislators to basically be
lobbyists by
disguising it as consulting. We
need to have disclosure on how special interests are spending money.
Who are
they wining and dining? And
there has to be consequences -- criminal penalties and jail time -- for
those
who don't follow the law. Legislators should be serving us instead of
themselves. Here's
what's discouraging. When I talk to President Bush about helping us, he
asked
me what I'm going to do to make sure the money goes to where it's
intended. The
first thing I hear from corporate CEOs is about our reputation for
corruption.
Corruption here has been a joke, but it's not funny when our reputation
is
stealing jobs from our kids.
Q:
Some people believe legislators and voters made a mistake in 2002 by
approving
the Stelly Amendment, which eliminated the sales tax on food and
utilities but
increased the state's personal income tax. Would you support a repeal
of
Stelly?
A:
The Legislature did the right thing by restoring the itemized
deductions like
mortgage interest, which should help taxpayers on their state income
tax. But
it was the right thing to do to repeal the sales tax on food and
utilities. I'm
not in favor of bringing those taxes back. It's
clear that states like Texas and Florida, where there are no income
taxes, are
enjoying the fastest economic growth, so it makes sense to decrease the
income
tax, but we can't do that overnight. We
have to get rid of the taxes on business first to create the growth and
revenue
that could eventually lead to our decreasing or e liminating the income
tax.
- HOME