Camellia Boulevard speed limit at
issue; join the conversation
5-year debate tangles
residents, City-Parish Council; traffic study to decide if 35 mph is
too slow
Amanda
McElfresh
theadvertiser
A nearly
five-year debate over the speed limit on Camellia
Boulevard is heating up again.
Currently,
the
speed limit is 35 miles per hour. Some officials and nearby residents
believe
that limit is too low for a four-lane, wide-laned road and have
suggested that
a 40- or 45-mph limit would better suit the roadway.
Others
say that
raising the speed limit would be dangerous, both for residents and
drivers, and
would not result in any significant changes in driving times.
"Can you go
faster on that road? Sure. Is it safe to go
faster on that road? No," said Pat Briney, a Steiner Road residents who
long has spoken out about the speed limit. "If you make the speed limit
45
(mph), then that's going to mean people are going to go 55, and the
road is not
designed for 55."
Officials
are
hoping a traffic study next month will settle the issue.
The
speed limit
was set as part of an agreement between residents and the City-Parish
Council
when the boulevard was completed in September 2003. But the limit was
set
without traffic or engineering studies being conducted, as is the case
when
setting speed limits on most other roads in the city.
"This
was
an attempt to negotiate the need for the project and at the same time
provide
assurance that speed was something that was being considered in the
process," said Tony Tramel, traffic and transportation director for
Lafayette Consolidated Government.
Although
disagreements about the speed limit have lingered since 2003, the
controversy
was stirred again earlier this month, when the City-Parish Council
voted to
allow Tramel's office to conduct a formal traffic study on Camellia,
which
could result in the speed limit being increased.
Outgoing
Councilman Rob Stevenson said he was concerned that decision would
reflect the
council going back on a promise to area residents.
"I'm
concerned that when negotiating with a neighborhood in the future, that
those
neighborhoods and the people in them will be deterred by what is
proposed here
tonight," Stevenson said. "I don't believe the spirit of the
agreement is being observed. I think the people have a right to feel
comfortable that when they make an agreement with the government, that
government is going to live up to that agreement."
But outgoing
Councilman Randy Menard, reading from documents at the Dec. 4 council
meeting,
said the agreement only states that the council would hold public
hearings if
it decided that the speed limit needed to be addressed.
"We're
not
breaking a promise; we are keeping our agreement," Menard said. "We
did introduce the ordinance at a public meeting, and no one signed up
to speak.
This meeting is also a public hearing, and people can address it."
One
of those
addressing the issue was architect Steve Oubre, who designed River
Ranch. Oubre
said he didn't think the 35 miles per hour limit should be increased.
As
an
experiment, Oubre said he drove on Camellia from Kaliste Saloom Road to
Johnston Street at 35 miles per hour, then again at 45 miles per hour.
Oubre
said he only saved 12 seconds when driving at the higher speed.
"Is
it
really worth 12 seconds? I would argue it is not," Oubre said. "This
is not only about traffic. It is about the pedestrians and about the
quality of
life of the residents.
It is really not that important to go 45 miles per hour.
Thirty-five is quite functional."
Lance
Bennett,
minister at Riverside Church of Christ on Camellia near Johnston
Street, also
said he would like to see the speed limit remain at 35 miles per hour.
"For
the
safety of our church members, especially when they're pulling out, we'd
like to
keep it at 35," Bennett said. "There's a lot of traffic on there, and
pulling out can be difficult as it is."
But
others say
they believe the 35 miles per hour limit is too slow for Camellia,
considering
the design and use of the road.
Vernon
Miller,
who lives on Eastland Drive just off of Camellia, said he thinks the
speed
limit should be increased.
"I
think
it's a little too slow right now," he said. "A lot of people go 45
(miles per hour) anyway, and I think 45 is alright. It wouldn't bother
me."
Bob
Sandberg,
another Eastland Drive resident, also said he doesn't agree with the
current
speed l imit.
"It's
too
slow for a four-lane road," he said. "I think they should probably
raise it."
Tramel
said he
would not make a guess as to what the speed limit should be.
"I
am going to do the required engineering studies and analysis, and we'll
provide
a report once that data is put together," he said.
HOME